Legal Opinion
Hollier v. Boustany
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1965No. 1553PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Judge.
The plaintiff Hollier purchased at sheriff’s sale a former tenant’s “right of occupancy” of certain premises for the unexpired term of the lease. By the present action. Hollier sues the landlord-owners (“Boustany”) for possession of the leased premises. The trial court dismissed the suit, holding that the lease had been can-celled before the sheriff seized the tenant’s right of occupancy (in order to sell it at the execution sale at which Hollier bought it).
By the plaintiff Hollier’s appeal, he contends that 'the attempted cancellation of the lease was ineffective. Hollier argues…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cassiere v. Cuban Coffee Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Ranson v. VoironSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Sunseri v. ThomanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Loyacano v. Villere & BurglassLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Walker v. DohanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carriere v. Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Meyers v. DrewesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Langley v. Police Jury of the Parish of CalcasieuLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- 327 Bourbon Street Inc. v. Pepe IncorporatedSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- 327 Bourbon Street, Inc. v. Pepe, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.