Legal Opinion

Mudge v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 26, 2007No. 00-228CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

Plaintiff, Robert O. Mudge, has applied for relief from the judgment previously entered in this case in December 2004, affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in November 2005. See Mudge v. United States, 63 Fed.Cl. 363 (2004) (“Mudge IV’), aff’d, 154 Fed.Appx. 916 (Fed.Cir.2005) *819(“Mudge F’).1 Mr. Mudge’s pending application is premised upon his allegations that declarations and materials provided in the prior proceedings by three federal officials misrepresented true facts and that the misrepresentations justify reopening this proceeding. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. David Warren v. Henry Garvin, Supt. Mid-Orange Correctional Facility, Robert HanslmaierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Tool Box, Inc. v. Ogden City Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. Wesco Products Co. And Donald Horwitz v. Alloy Automotive Co., and Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Robert O. Mudge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Mark Dunning Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API