Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Rosa

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided May 31, 2001No. 04-99-00791-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion On Appellee’s Amended Motion FOR REHEARING En BaNC

Opinion by:

SARAH B. DUNCAN, Justice.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. appeals the trial court’s judgment against it in Petra Rosa’s premise defect suit. The court has reconsidered the case en banc and withdraws the panel opinion and judgment dated October 31, 2000. We hold there is no evidence from which it can be inferred that Wal-Mart had actual knowledge or constructive notice of the premise defect for so long that it should have been discovered and removed. We therefore reverse the trial court’s judgment and render judgment in Wal-Mart’s favor.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Keetch v. Kroger Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. GonzalezTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Stafford v. StaffordTexas Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ReeceTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Pena v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  3. Annie East v. Southwest Cimm's Inc. D/B/A Burger King 1002 A/K/A Cimm's Incorporated, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
  4. Brown v. Nordstrom IncDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024
  5. H.E. Butt Grocery Company v. Juan Rivera, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API