Legal Opinion

Pender v. . Mallett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1898PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Petition by defendant for Certiorari as substitute for an appeal in an action pending in Edgecombe Superior Court on the grounds stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

The Court overruled the demurrer, gave the defendant time till the 20th May, to file answer, and ordered that defendants appear before the Clerk to be examined under oath concerning the matters set out in the pleadings, Code, Section 580 et seq. The defendant excepted to the order and the judgment, but the Court being of opinion that an appeal did not lie, noted the exception and directed the Clerk not now to send up a transcript. The defendants thereupon applied, after notice to the plaintiff, to this Court for a certiorari. It is true that an appeal from the order of examination…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vann v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Holt v. Southern Finishing & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Wake County v. MagninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. Ramsay v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Allred v. GravesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Bohannon v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Ward v. . MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Shelby v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Monroe v. . HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API