Legal Opinion

Federal Sign System v. Leopold

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1929No. 8642PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

Plaintiff sued Arthur B. Leopold, as principal and Arnold Falk, as surety for breach of a written contract whereby the plaintiff agreed to install an electric sign reading “Pantages Vaudeville” in front of a theatre, 320 Dauphine Street, for a term of thirty-six (36) months from the date of installation; the sign was to *710burn from dark until 11 p. m., for seven days a week; the consideration of said contract was $27.15 per week, payable in advance, and the further sum of $14.00 per month in case of the breach of the agreement.

It claims $27.15 per week from date of last payment, May 28, 192‡,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Orleans & J. Ry. Co. v. International Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  2. J. Davidson Hill & Co. v. BourcierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
  3. Barrow v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
  4. Provan v. PercySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1856
  5. Stewart v. LacoumeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lama v. ManaleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  2. Pennington v. DrewsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  3. Dennis Miller Pest Controls, Inc. v. WellsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Morris Buick Co. v. RayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Lama v. ManaleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API