Legal Opinion

Pennington v. Drews

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 9, 1949No. 39160PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCALEB, Justice.

This is the third time this matter has been brought here for review. It is a suit for enforcement of a contract by injunction, coupled with a demand for the recovery of penalties allegedly due in consequence of defendant’s breach. The facts which gave rise to the litigation are not seriously disputed and we find them to be as follows:

The defendant, Drews, is the inventor of a certain electrical instrument, known as an “Atomiscope” designed for use in geophysical work as an aid in determining the presence of structure or fault favorable for the accumulation of oil and gas.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heeb v. Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Pennington v. DrewsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  3. Solomon v. DiefenthalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
  4. Seeger v. SeegerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  5. Stewart-Mcghee Const. Co. v. Caddo Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
  2. Ouachita Nat. v. Gulf States Land & Dev.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Lombardo v. DeshotelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Mire v. HawkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. White v. CrookLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API