Legal Opinion

Cooley v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the defendant, The City of New York, from an order . of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of' the county of Queens on the 18th day of April,. 1903, granting the plaintiff’s motion to strike out certain paragraphs in the defendant’s answer.

1Opinion of the Court

Hookeb, J.:

In his complaint the plaintiff alleges that the defendant is' a municipal corporation organized pursuant to chapter 378 of the Laws of 1897, as amended, which took effect January 1, 1898; that prior to the latter date plaintiff, was a regularly appointed clerk of one of the villages included within the greater city of New York, at an annual salary of $1,200 ; that pursuant to section 1536 of the Greater New York charter (Laws of 1897, chap. 378) he was, on or about the 1st day of December, 1897, assigned to duty in the office of the city clerk of the city of New York; that he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Honegger v. . WettsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Milbank v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Hendrickson v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Boyer v. FennAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
  5. Keans v. New York & College Point Ferry Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fay v. MoehlenpahNew York Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API