Legal Opinion

Houghton v. Forrest

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 19, 2010No. 12, September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

Petitioner Arnold Houghton, an officer in the Baltimore City Police Department (“BCPD”), was sued for intentional and constitutional torts committed against Respondent Cheryl Forrest in the course of Houghton’s duties. The case was tried in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, where a jury found against Houghton and awarded compensatory damages to Forrest. On appeal, Houghton argued that the trial verdict should be overturned on grounds of governmental immunity. Because common law public official immunity does not apply to intentional torts, and Houghton cannot identify any…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. DiPino v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Lee v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Cooper v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  2. D'AOUST v. DiamondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Doe v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Board of Education v. Marks-SloanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Proctor v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API