Legal Opinion

Borne v. Sutton

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 2004No. 04-CA-826PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I «SUSAN M. CHEHARDY, Judge.

In this matter, the trial judge granted David Sutton’s request for a reduction in child support for his son, Gage Sutton. On appeal, David Sutton seeks a further reduction in his child support payment to Gage’s mother, Shane Borne. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court judgment.

On July 1, 1998, Gage Sutton was born to Shane Borne(“Borne”) and David Sutton(“Sutton”). In a consent judgment that was rendered on August 3, 1999 and signed on February 29, 2000, Borne and Sutton agreed to joint custody of Gage with Borne designated as the primary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Mart v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  4. Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  5. Hogan v. HoganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Broussard v. RogersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. State Department of Children & Family Services ex rel. J.C. v. CharlesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Justin Hodges v. Amy HodgesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  4. Justin Hodges v. Amy HodgesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  5. Justin Hodges v. Amy HodgesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API