Legal Opinion

Schofield v. Gold

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1923No. Civil No. 2069PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This action is for partition and, incidentally, to cancel a deed of the property sought to be partitioned. The appeal is from an order sustaining demurrers, and a judgment of dismissal.

The plaintiff’s mother, Dolores Schofield, in 1895, intermarried with defendant Martin Gold and lived with him continuously as his wife until July 3, 1916, on which date she died, intestate. The other three defendants, Helen, Rosa and Dolores Gold, were the issue of this marriage. During coverture they accumulated considerable property, which is alleged to belong to the community. February 15, 1916, Dolores…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. CraggTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Grigsby v. MayTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Luhrs v. HancockArizona Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Hulett v. Ras PlattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Spikes-Nash Co. v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schofield v. GoldArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Manor v. StevensArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Jacobs v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Wood v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API