Legal Opinion

Sarazin v. Vermont Board of Bar Examiners

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 18, 1994No. 93-176PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Applicant Mary Levin Sarazin appeals from a decision of the Vermont Board of Bar Examiners holding that the rule requiring four-year clerkship applicants for the Vermont bar1 to pursue their clerkships only at firms located in Vermont is a “bright line” rule that may not be waived. We hold that the in-state requirement is waivable and remand for further consideration of Ms. Sarazin’s application.

We have original jurisdiction over appeals from the Board of Bar Examiners. Rules of Admission to the Bar of the Vermont Supreme Court (V.R.A.B.) § 14(b). The Board contends that applicant’s appeal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Monti v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Lewis Y. BirtSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  2. In re Jeffrey G. OdenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  3. Ball v. Board of Bar ExaminersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  4. Parks v. Board of Bar ExaminersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  5. In Re HartSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API