Legal Opinion

Getty v. Ames

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1897PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From Coos: J. C. Fullerton. Judge. Suit for the foreclosure of certain mechanics’ liens, and from the decree entered plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bean.

This is a suit by R. W. Getty to foreclose two alleged mechanics’ liens claimed by him upon a building and fence belonging to the defendants Ames and Thibault. The defendants Christensen & Johnson, by their answer, deny the validity of said liens, and set up and seek to foreclose a mechanics’ lien of their own upon the same property for labor performed and material furnished. The defendants *575O’Connell and Flanagan are mortgage lien claimants, and by their answers controvert the validity of the Christensen & Johnson lien, and also those claimed by the plaintiff, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allen v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Rankin v. MalarkeyOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Dillon v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Leick v. BeersOregon Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Christman v. SalwayOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Title Guarantee Co. v. WrennOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  3. General Electric Co. v. E. Fred Sulzer and Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  4. Johnson v. AlmOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Wheatcroft v. GriffithsIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API