Interior Trails Preservation Coalition v. Swope
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Interior Trails Preservation Coalition brought an action against Greg and Donna Swope claiming a public prescriptive easement over the Swopes’ property for recreational use. The superior court dismissed the action, concluding as a matter of law that the Coalition was incapable of prevailing on its claim because it had not been in existence for ten years — the minimum time required to establish its continuing use of the alleged easement. We reverse, holding that because the Coalition claimed a public easement, it was not required to prove its own…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brimstone Mining, Inc. v. GlausMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- McGill v. WahlAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Alaska National Bank v. LinckAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- J. F. Gioia, Inc. v. Cardinal American Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hansen v. DavisAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Dickson v. State, Dept. of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Price v. EasthamAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Kelly A. Dickson, Trustee of the Kelly A. Dickson 2008 Trust, and Donna C. Defusco v. State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources , and also all other persons or parties unknown claiming a right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the real estate described in this actionAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- London & Stetelman Inc., L & D, LLC, and Andrew D. Stetelman v. Nelson Tackett and Judy Tackett, Both Individually and as Co-Trustees of the Nelson and Judy Tackett Joint Revocable Trust, and Subway Sandwich Shops of Hattiesburg, IncCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2020