Legal Opinion
Loud v. Brooks
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 3, 1928No. Docket No. 98PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFlannigan, C. J.
This is an appeal from Macomb county. The controversy involves the ownership of a strip of land 20 feet wide and 150 feet long shown on the original plat of the' village of Romeo as an alley running north and south between lots 8 and 4 on the west and 5 and 6 on the east. It is conceded by all parties the title to the alley strip and the four lots was in one Flora M. Ford on May 10, 1920. On that date she conveyed to defendants by warranty deed:
“All those certain pieces or parcels of land situate and being in the village of Romeo, county of Macomb a.nd State of Michigan, and described as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bissell v. . the New York Central R.R. CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Snoddy v. BolenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Paine v. Consumers' Forwarding & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Pettibone v. HamiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Johnson & Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- David Shoemaker v. City of HowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Thies v. HowlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- 2000 Baum Family Trust v. BabelMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Hall v. WantzMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- United States v. Joan McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.