Legal Opinion

Ammon v. Narragansett Dairy Co.

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided July 31, 1918No. 74PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Equity. Bill by Ammon '& Person, a corporation, against the Narrangansett Dairy Company, Eimited.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

This is a hill in equity to restrain the defendant from using the word “Queen” as a trade-mark for oleomargarine. The defendant, by counterclaim, seeks a similar remedy against the use of the word “Queen” by the plaintiff.

The plaintiff, Ammon & Person, is a corporation of the state of *277New Jersey, having its principal place of business in Jersey City, and the defendant, Narrangansett Dairy Company, Limited, is a corporation of the state of Rhode Island, with its principal business at Providence, R. I.

it is proved that the plaintiff’s predecessors had applied the trademark…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Saxlehner v. Eisner & Mendelson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Thomas G. Plant Co. v. May Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  4. Gordon's Dry Gin Co. v. Eddy & Fisher Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1917

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hemmeter Cigar Co. v. Congress Cigar Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  2. Loughran v. Quaker City Chocolate & Confectionery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
  3. Dickinson v. O. & W. THUM CO.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
  4. Stark v. Stark Bros. Nurseries & Orchards Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
  5. Pinaud, Inc. v. HuebschmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API