Legal Opinion

Fitz-Gerald v. Hull

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1951No. A-2738Published

1Opinion of the Court

237 S.W.2d 256 (1951)

FITZ-GERALD

v.

HULL et al.

No. A-2738.

Supreme Court of Texas.

February 14, 1951.

Rehearing Denied April 4, 1951.

Turner, Rodgers, Winn, Scurlock & Terry and Carlton R. Winn, all of Dallas, Gerald Fitz-Gerald, Midland, and Lloyd Croslin, Lubbock, for petitioner.

Martin, Moore & Brewster and Arthur Lee Moore, all of Fort Worth, Dan Moody, Austin, for respondents.

GRIFFIN, Justice.

In this cause the respondents herein, H. Winston Hull and Charles C. Green, as plaintiffs, sued the petitioner, James Fitz-Gerald, as defendant, in a statutory action of trespass to try title to, and for…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Fitz-Gerald v. HullTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. White v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Lewis v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  4. James v. FulcrodTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  5. MacDonald v. FollettTexas Supreme Court · 1944

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API