Curtiss v. Aetna Life Insurance
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Plaintiff recovered judgment on an oral contract of insurance for compensatory and punitive damages. Defendant appeals from a denial of its motion for judgment N.O.V. We affirm.
A. Alleged material misrepresentations were questions of fact for the jury.
Plaintiff made application with Aetna Life Insurance Company for an insurance policy which covered health insurance. In answer to one question: “Has any person to be covered had any Accident, Health or Life Insurance . . . declined . . . ?” Plaintiff answered “No”.
Whether this answer was a material misrepresentation depends…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State Farm General Insurance Company v. CliftonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- Modisette v. Foundation Reserve Insurance Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Hooker v. HancockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
- Aguayo v. Village of ChamaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Romero v. Mervyn'sNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Casson v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1982
- United Nuclear Corp. v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Hood v. FulkersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Anderson v. Dairyland InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.