Legal Opinion

Rusinowski v. Village of Hillside

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 29, 2011No. Case No. 11 C 4772PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HARRY D. LEINENWEBER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court are Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. (The Court denies Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the first Complaint, Dkt. #s 12 and 14, as moot.) For the reasons stated herein, the Court grants in part and denies in part the Hillside Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss; grants in part and denies in part Defendant Andreski’s Motion to Dismiss Count IV and grants his request for a clearer statement of Count V; grants Elmhurst Memorial’s Motion to Dismiss Count IV without prejudice; and…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Singh v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Wesly v. National Hemophilia FoundationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  3. Rebolar v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  4. United States ex rel. Upton v. Family Health Network, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  5. Townsel v. JamersonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API