Legal Opinion
United States v. David Hartzog
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 12, 1993No. 92-5414PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUTTIG, Circuit Judge:
Defendant appellant Hartzog was convicted on five related firearms charges. On appeal, he challenges both his sentence and the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction under count five. Finding no error, we affirm.
I
Three separate purchases of firearms are at issue in this appeal. On October 23, 1990, in Chesterfield County, Virginia, Wanda Bowman purchased three guns on behalf of Hartzog because Hartzog, a non-Virginia resident, could not purchase firearms from federally licensed dealers in that state. Shortly after this transaction, agents from the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. DavidCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Kaya AymelekCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Patrick G. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Connie Sue Heater, United States of America v. Harvey Bernard John, United States of America v. Timothy W. McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Cummings v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Nicolas NicolaouCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Kenneth Terry NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. KrugCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.