Legal Opinion

Fontana v. Integrity Mutual Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1926No. 26,255PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action to recover on a policy of industrial insurance. The defense was that the deceased was not within its terms.

The controlling facts were these: One J. H. Vincent, lessee of some coal lands in Crawford county, operated these coal lands by subletting parcels of them to a number of small mining firms, one of which was the Boone & Monahan Coal Company. This firm sold its interest to Joe Fontana and three other men, who were miners by trade, and these four took over the sublease from Boone & Monahan. They named their business…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bracken v. ChamplinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Harris v. DrenningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Scoby v. Bird City State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. Swaller v. Williamson Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Carlgren v. SaindonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Paul v. Western Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  3. Johnson v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. McGarr v. E. V. Schnoor Cigar Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Kiser v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API