Semaan v. Liquor Control Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtArcher, J.
The plaintiff, Gerald Edward Se-maan, challenged the Liquor Control Commission’s award of a Specially Designated Distributor1 license to John and Jane Waszchuk. The Waszchuks applied for the sdd license first, but Semaan argued that when the Waszchuks applied they were not qualified for the license according to the commission’s own rules.
Following Semaan’s appeal in the Oakland Cir*31cuit Court, the trial judge remanded the case to the commission, stating that the commission must weigh each of the ten factors discussed below in evaluating an applicant’s license qualifications. The trial judge…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Viculin v. Department of Civil ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Noey v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Mallchok v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- J & P Market, Inc v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Brang Inc v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Hanks v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Semaan v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1986