Legal Opinion

Semaan v. Liquor Control Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1986No. 74857, (Calendar No. 6)Published

1Opinion of the Court

425 Mich. 28 (1986)

387 N.W.2d 786

SEMAAN

v.

LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION

Docket No. 74857, (Calendar No. 6).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued February 8, 1986.

Decided May 20, 1986.

Rothstein, Erlich & Rothstein (by Stewart I. Erlich, Lawrence R. Rothstein, and Jay L. Rothstein) for the plaintiff.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Louis J. Caruso, Solicitor General, and Frank J. Pipp and Richard I. Rubin, Assistant Attorneys General, for the defendant.

ARCHER, J.

The plaintiff, Gerald Edward Semaan, challenged the Liquor Control Commission's award of a Specially Designated Distributor[1] license to John…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Viculin v. Department of Civil ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Noey v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Mallchok v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API