Ameristeel Corp. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
RENDELL, Circuit Judge.
I. Introduction
This appeal presents the question whether a successor employer who has expressly refused to be bound by its predecessor’s collective bargaining agreement may nonetheless be forced to arbitrate grievances pertaining to the agreement. Because an unconsenting successor cannot be bound by the substantive provisions of its predecessor’s agreement, we hold that the successor in this case, appellee Amer-iSteel Corporation, cannot be forced to arbitrate the extent of its obligations under the agreement. AmeriSteel, quite simply, has no…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ameristeel Corp. v. Inter. Broth. of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- People v. Man Hao LuongColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Eastern Atlantic States Carpenters Fund v. San Mart Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- VERIZON PENNSYLVANIA LLC v. COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 13000District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020