Legal Opinion
Genentech, Inc. v. Regents of the University of California
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided September 27, 1996No. MDL Docket No. 912, IP-90-1679-C-D/GPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Entry Granting UC’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Based on the Eleventh Amendment
DILLIN, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on UC’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction based on the Eleventh Amendment. For the following reasons, UC’s motion is GRANTED.
Background
The present action is one of six cases consolidated in this Court for pretrial proceedings by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. See In re Recombinant DNA Technology Patent and Contract Litig., Docket No. 912 (J.P.M.L. Feb. 19, 1992), affd, In re Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 964 F.2d 1128…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Welch v. Texas Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Denise Chavez, United States of America, Intervenor v. Arte Publico Press Nicolas Kanellos University of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Denise Chavez, United States of America, Intervenor v. Arte Publico Press Nicolas Kanellos University of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Genentech, Inc. v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Genentech, Inc. v. Regents of the University of California, and Eli Lilly and Company, and United States, Intervenor. Genentech, Inc. v. Regents of the University of California, and Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.