Legal Opinion

Genentech, Inc. v. Regents of the University of California, and Eli Lilly and Company, and United States, Intervenor. Genentech, Inc. v. Regents of the University of California, and Eli Lilly and Company

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 5, 1998No. 97-1099PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

143 F.3d 1446

126 Ed. Law Rep. 621, 46 U.S.P.Q.2d 1586

GENENTECH, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellee,

and

Eli Lilly and Company, Defendant,

and

United States, Intervenor.

GENENTECH, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellant,

and

Eli Lilly and Company, Defendant.

Nos. 96-1361, 97-1099.

United States Court of Appeals,

Federal Circuit.

May 4, 1998

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc

Declined Aug. 5, 1998.

John E. Kidd, Rogers & Wells, New York City, argued for Genentech, Inc. With him on briefs were…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New Jersey v. Yeutseun Chen (In Re Yeutseun Chen)District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API