Glover v. Alcott
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo Circuit. The case is sufficiently-stated in the opinion of Justice Christiancy.
1Opinion of the Court
Christiancy J.:
This was an action of trover brought in the Court below by the defendant in error, who was a married woman residing with her husband, to recover damages for the conversion of certain bags, barrels, and a quantity of mill feed. The defendant below (plaintiff in error) justified the taking .-and conversion as a constable, by virtue of an execution -.upon a judgment against William W. Alcott, the husband of the plaintiff below. The judgment was rendered on the 23d day of June, 1860, and the execution issued and levy made on .the 29th day of June, 1861. It does not appear wheD the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hauptman v. . CatlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Colby v. LamsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1855
- Southard v. PiperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1853
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lake v. BenderNevada Supreme Court · 1884
- Mosier v. CarneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Strouse v. LeipfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Tong v. MarvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Trapnell v. ConklynWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.