Legal Opinion

Allan F. Breed v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Lionel Taylor and Henry Parker, Real Parties in Interest

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 29, 1976No. 75-1820PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:

Petitioners, defendants in the trial court, seek a writ of mandamus or prohibition under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, directing a three-judge district court to vacate its order compelling discovery. We postponed submission pending decision by the Supreme Court in Kerr v. United States District Court, 9 Cir., 1975, 511 F.2d 192, affirmed, 1976, 426 U.S. 394, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976). We now submit the case and deny the petition.

I. Jurisdiction.

As a preliminary matter, we consider whether we have jurisdiction of a petition for an extraordinary writ…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Henry W. Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, John Van Geldern, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. Gonzalez v. Automatic Employees Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
  2. Kelly v. City of San JoseDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
  3. King v. CondeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
  4. Babasa v. LensCrafters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Green v. BacaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API