Kerney v. Kerney

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Goldmann, S. J. A. D.

Plaintiffs-respondents move, on notice to defendants-appellants, for an order to suppress appellants’ brief and to dismiss their appeal, for the reasons that (1) the brief is directed solely to those parts of the Chancery Division final judgment from which an appeal was not taken, and (2) the brief does not discuss that part of the judgment from which the appeal was taken.

The judgment in question was entered April 29, 1963. It contained nine numbered adjudications, of which only the first five need be mentioned. They read as…