Legal Opinion

Hulsey v. Scheidt

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 11, 1994No. 1-92-1028, 1-93-0043 consPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scariano

Defendant Appleton Company, Inc., brings an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 306(a)(l)(iii) (134 Ill. 2d R. 306(a)(l)(iii)), seeking review of the circuit court’s denial of its motion to quash service for want of jurisdiction over its person. In a separate but now consolidated interlocutory appeal, defendants Jayce Scheidt and Chrysler Corporation appeal from the circuit court’s denial of their joint motion seeking a dismissal of plaintiffs’ action and a transfer to Lake County, Indiana, under the doctrine of forum non conveniens pursuant to Supreme Court Rule…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Cook Associates, Inc. v. Lexington United Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Bland v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Griffith v. Mitsubishi Aircraft International, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Wieser v. Missouri Pacific RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. Bill Berger Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  2. Fennell v. Illinois Central R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Gaidar v. Tippecanoe Distribution Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Riemer v. KSL Recreation Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. Evans v. MD Con, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API