In Re Spraker
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
PER CURIAM.. This attorney discipline case arises from the respondent's faulty representation of 50 individuals in immigration cases. In those cases, Respondent Gary M. Spraker either neglected his clients' legal affairs, provided bad legal advice to them, lied to the client or others, or engaged in some combination of such misconduct. Today we approve a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline, submitted by the Disciplinary Commission and the respondent, calling for the respondent's suspension from the practice of law for at least two years for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re WarrenIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Matter of TracyIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Jose Luis Gutierrez v. Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Gutierrez, Jose L. v. Gonzales, AlbertoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006