Legal Opinion
Kokomo Tube Co. v. Dayton Equipment Services Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 18, 1997No. 96-2993PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Claiming consequential damages stemming from a static cast line not being installed in time for its factory’s open house, Kokomo Tube Company brought a breach of contract action against the contractor for the job, Dayton Equipment Services Company. Dayton was not paid all that it charged Kokomo Tube for the project, so it, in turn, filed a counterclaim alleging breach of contract by Kokomo Tube. Dayton had also recorded a mechanic’s lien on the property where Koko-mo Tube is located when it became clear that Kokomo Tube would not be paying the balance it owed. Dayton…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Max I. Bittner v. Sadoff & Rudoy IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Basf Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Old World Trading Company, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Cottrill v. Sparrow, Johnson & Ursillo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Harold Daniels and Irene DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Jan Bocian, Also Known as Jan Gramo v. Salvador Godinez, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCarter v. Retirement Plan for the District Managers of the American Family Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Penn v. Ryan's Family Steakhouses, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000
- Jean McCarter v. Retirement Plan for the DistriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Kokomo Tube Company, a Unit of Ultra-Cast, Incorporated v. Dayton Equipment Services Company, Dayton Equipment Services Company v. Triple S Holdings, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997