Legal Opinion

Kokomo Tube Company, a Unit of Ultra-Cast, Incorporated v. Dayton Equipment Services Company, Dayton Equipment Services Company v. Triple S Holdings, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 18, 1997No. 96-2993Published

1Opinion of the Court

123 F.3d 616

KOKOMO TUBE COMPANY, a unit of Ultra-Cast, Incorporated,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DAYTON EQUIPMENT SERVICES COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

DAYTON EQUIPMENT SERVICES COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

TRIPLE S HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-2993.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Argued Feb. 27, 1997.

Decided Aug. 18, 1997.

Jeffrey D. Spilman, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Robert J. Palmer (argued), E. Spencer Walton, Jr., May, Oberfell & Lorber, South Bend, IN, for Defendant-Appellant.

Timothy W. Woods (argued), Thomas F. Lewis, Jr., Jones, Obenchain, Ford,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Max I. Bittner v. Sadoff & Rudoy IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Basf Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Old World Trading Company, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Cottrill v. Sparrow, Johnson & Ursillo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Harold Daniels and Irene DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Jan Bocian, Also Known as Jan Gramo v. Salvador Godinez, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API