Legal Opinion

Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. Palermo

California Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1961No. Sac. 7100Published

1Opinion of the Court

55 Cal.2d 439 (1961)

STOCKTON THEATRES, INC. (a Corporation), Appellant,

v.

EMIL PALERMO et al., Respondents.

Sac. No. 7100.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Mar. 2, 1961.

Freed & Freed, Eli Freed and Kurt W. Melchior for Appellant.

Forrest E. Macomber, in pro. per., Gordon J. Aulik and Smith & Zeller for Respondents.

PETERS, J.

Stockton Theatres, Inc., appeals from two orders made after judgment, one entered on January 20, 1959, taxing an item of costs as effective on that date, and the other entered on April 30, 1959, which, in legal effect, overruled plaintiff's motion that such item of costs…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API