Legal Opinion
Autar Edward Nauton v. Walter E. Craven, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 10, 1975No. 74-2473Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant Nauton, a California state prisoner, petitioned the district court for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that damaging evidence introduced at his state court trial for robbery was obtained in violation of the federal wiretap statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq. The district court summarily dismissed the petition on the ground that Nauton had not exhausted his state remedies as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b). Nauton appeals.
In his petition, Nauton alleged that, following his arrest for two of the robberies with which he was charged, he was permitted to place a telephone call…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Lee v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Billy Joe Wright v. Fred R. Dickson, Warden, California State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- In Re SterlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Rowe v. PeytonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.