Privett v. Clendenin
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JOHNSTONE, Justice.
Dr. George W. Privett, Jr., and Holly Clendenin were married for almost thirteen years and were blessed with two children. While still married, Privett and Clendenin established two accounts under the Kentucky Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (UTMA) for the benefit of their children. Clendenin was named custodian of the accounts. After their marriage was dissolved, Privett petitioned the Jessamine Circuit Court for relief against Clendenin under the UTMA. The trial court ruled in Privett’s favor. The Court of Appeals reversed on grounds that the Jessamine…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Duncan v. O'NANCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- Buder v. Sartore ex rel. BuderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Commonwealth Health Corp. v. CroslinKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
- Kampschaefer v. Commonwealth ex rel. KampschaeferCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1988
3Cited by21 opinions
- Parts Depot, Inc. v. BeiswengerKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
- Peter v. GibsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Karem v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Cabinet for Health & Family Services v. J.T.G.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
- Commonwealth v. GrovesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.