Legal Opinion
Richard v. Fliflet
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 1985No. Civ. 10814PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
The defendant and third-party plaintiff, Norval K. Fliflet, appeals from a district court judgment dismissing his action against the third-party defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), and ordering him to pay the plaintiff, Steven R. Richard, $1,100 in damages. We reverse.
State Farm and Fliflet stipulated to the following facts:
“1. On January 7, 1983, Norval Fli-flet, of Hannaford, North Dakota, was driving a 1974 Plymouth Fury III automobile owned by his brother-in-law, Daniel Bye, also of Hannaford, when it was involved in an accident…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Frederick W. Shockley, Etc. v. Ralph M. Sallows, Colonial Penn Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
3Cited by24 opinions
- Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. University of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Harkrider v. PoseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Van Horn v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dairyland Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Sandberg v. American Family Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.