Legal Opinion
Gachette v. Metro North-High Bridge
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 18, 2018No. 17-209-cvUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
17-209-cv Gachette v. Metro North-High Bridge UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mihalik v. Credit Agricole Cheuvreux North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Fincher v. Depository Trust and Clearing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Lucas v. MilesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Jocelyn Whidbee, Shirlene Tranquille v. Garzarelli Food Specialties, Inc., Ed and John Garzarelli, OwnersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,266 Irene L. Wright, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ernst & Young LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.