Legal Opinion

Barlock v. Orient Coal & Coke Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 2, 1935No. Appeal, 52PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The injured employee received compensation under paragraph “c” of the act at the maximum rate for a period of 215 weeks for the loss of his left leg. He claims compensation for an additional period of at least three hundred weeks for partial disability arising in the same injury, to his right leg, separate, apart and distinct from the loss of his left leg. This compensation was fixed by the board at 25% loss in earning power.

The question may be stated to be: Where an injured employee is compensated under paragraph “c” for the loss of a leg, and compensation is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lente v. LuciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Bausch v. FidlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Barlock v. Orient Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Sustar v. Penn Smokeless Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Baffi v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kessler v. North Side Packing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Horton v. West Penn Power Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Tinsman v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Cammie v. I. T. E. Circuit Breaker Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Ingram v. W. J. Rainey, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API