Legal Opinion
Whitehead v. Nevada Com'n on Judicial Discipline
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided February 24, 1995No. 24598PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
893 P.2d 866 (1995)
In re Petition for a Writ of Prohibition or in the Alternative for a Writ of Mandamus.
The Honorable Jerry Carr WHITEHEAD, Petitioner,
v.
NEVADA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE, Respondent.
No. 24598.
Supreme Court of Nevada.
February 24, 1995.
Ohlson & Springgate, Reno; Hamilton & Lynch, Reno; Gentile and Porter, Las Vegas; Laura Wightman FitzSimmons, Las Vegas, for Petitioner.
Leonard I. Gang, Carson City, for Respondent.[2]
Peter Alpert, Las Vegas; Gerald Stern New York, for Amicus Curiae Association of Disciplinary Counsel.
Leo Puccinelli, Elko, for Amicus Curiae Ad Hoc…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited123 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Whitehead v. Nevada Commission of Judicial DisciplineNevada Supreme Court · 1995