People v. Holton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: Supreme Court did not err in admitting into evidence a tape recording of a telephone call placed to plant security personnel by the victim of an attempted robbery immediately after the incident. The evidence was properly admitted pursuant to the present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule (see, People v Buie, 86 NY2d 501; People v Brown, 80 NY2d 729; People v *1021Montgomery, 224 AD2d 914). Because the evidence is admissible under an independent hearsay exception, "we reject the bolstering concept as inapplicable in this case” (People v Buie, supra, at 509; see also, People…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. BuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. MontgomeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. SempleNew York Supreme Court · 1997