Legal Opinion

People v. Holton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1996No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Supreme Court did not err in admitting into evidence a tape recording of a telephone call placed to plant security personnel by the victim of an attempted robbery immediately after the incident. The evidence was properly admitted pursuant to the present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule (see, People v Buie, 86 NY2d 501; People v Brown, 80 NY2d 729; People v *1021Montgomery, 224 AD2d 914). Because the evidence is admissible under an independent hearsay exception, "we reject the bolstering concept as inapplicable in this case” (People v Buie, supra, at 509; see also, People…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. BuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. People v. MontgomeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SempleNew York Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API