Legal Opinion · Dissent

MEA-MFT v. Fox (LR 127)

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2014No. OP 13-0789Published

1DissentJustice Mckinnon

¶28 Since 1906, tibe people of Montana have reserved to themselves the power to approve or reject by referendum any act of the Legislature, except an appropriation of money. Nicholson v. Cooney, 265 Mont. 406, 410, 877 F.2d 486, 488 (1994). The referendum provision is set forth in Article III, Section 5, of Montana’s Constitution. In interpreting this provision, we must be guided by the principle that “initiative and referendum provisions of the Constitution should be broadly construed to maintain the maximum power in the people,” Nicholson, 265 Mont. at 411, 877 P.2d at 488 (citing Chouteau…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bonner v. DixonMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Board of Regents of Higher Education v. JudgeMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State Ex Rel. Steen v. MurrayMontana Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. Michael LetaskyMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State ex rel. Bray v. LongMontana Supreme Court · 1898

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API