Legal Opinion

State v. Pilling

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1909No. 7817PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce-county, Snell, J., entered October 24, 1908, upon a trial and conviction of the crime of drawing upon a bank without, funds wherewith to meet the check.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, C. J.

On the 1st day of August, 1908, the defendant, Pilling, drew a check on the Daly Bank & Trust Company of Butte, Montana, in favor of James R. Thompson for the sum of $18,000, and delivered the same to the payee therein named. Thompson endorsed and delivered the check to the Scandinavian-American Bank of Tacoma, Washington, and the latter institution cashed the check • and delivered the proceeds to Pilling or Thompson, Pilling ultimately receiving the money. The check was not paid on presentation, and an information was thereupon filed against the defendant under § 1 of the act of March &,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re MileckeWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State v. KellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Valentín Cruz v. Torres MarreroSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
  4. Bronson v. SyversonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State v. MeeksArizona Supreme Court · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API