Legal Opinion

United States v. Printy

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 23, 2004No. 4—03—1047PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Appleton

The United States of America appeals the entry of an order by the trial court, which was entered by the mandate of this court on a prior appeal. We affirm the trial court’s interpretation of that mandate.

I. BACKGROUND

When Floyd Funk died in January 1983, he left a valid will naming his surviving spouse, defendant Patsy Printy, as the executrix of his estate. At the time of his death, Floyd owned a 62-acre farm in Scott County, Illinois, and a three-quarter interest in another farm. (Floyd’s then-12-year-old son, Michael, owned the other one-quarter interest in that farm.) In February 1983,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Busch v. Graphic Color Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State Bank of Lake Zurich v. ThillIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Harrison v. Hardin County Community Unit School District No. 1Illinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In Re Estate of MinskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of FunkIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. United States v. PrintyIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. United States v. PrintyIllinois Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API