Boston v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’NEILL, Justice.
Appellant, George Edward Boston, pleaded not guilty to the offense of aggravated robbery and not true to an enhancement paragraph alleging a prior robbery conviction. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.03 (Vernon 1995). The jury found him guilty as charged in the indictment and, finding the enhancement allegation to be true, assessed punishment at thirty-five years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. In twelve points of error, appellant contends (1) the prosecutor’s jury argument during the punishment phase was improper, (2) the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Santellan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Hutch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Jimenez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Karnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
- Lindsay v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- McDonald v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.