Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gamiño
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1. We review the recommendation of the referee, Timothy L. Vocke, that Attorney Carlos A. Gamiño's petition seeking the reinstatement of his license to practice law in Wisconsin be granted. No appeal has been filed so we review this matter pursuant to SCR 22.17(2).1 After consideration of the referee's report and the entire record, we agree that Attorney Gamiño's petition for reinstatement should be granted, but we impose conditions on his reinstatement as set forth herein. We direct that the costs of the reinstatement proceeding, which total $7,827.83 as of December 13, 2010, be paid by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Storms v. Action Wisconsin Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. ListerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against GaminoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against GaminoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Christopher A. MutschlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019