Legal Opinion

Narans v. Paulsen

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1990No. 90-6PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

The central question presented in this appeal is whether one of several co-makers on an original promissory note can become, on a subsequent renewal of that note, an accommodation party who, after he pays off the note, is entitled to recover on the note from the other original co-makers. After a bench trial, the district court judge found that A1 Paulsen, O.D., who along with his business associates had signed the original note, was an accommodation party on the last of several subsequent renewals of that note and was, therefore, entitled to recover from his business…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. Pennzoil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Chapman v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Robertson v. TWP, INC.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Kennedy v. KennedyWyoming Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Slavens v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Frost Construction Co. v. Lobo, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Meima v. BroemmelWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Mathis v. WendlingWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Schaub v. WilsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API