Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Cummings

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 13, 1936No. 6 Div. 852PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Appellant, Mrs. Elsie Daniel, filed her bill against Citizens Home Building & Loan Association and H. K. Cummings, to cancel a mortgage on her lands upon the ground that it was given to secure her husband’s' debt, save a very small sum, which she offered to pay. Further averments and prayer sought to cancel in so far as the mortgage was given to secure the husband’s debt, or reduce the mortgage debt by that amount, and redeem. A further prayer sought redemption after foreclosure within the statutory period.

The trial court, hearing the case on oral testimony, held the mortgage…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lester v. JacobsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Bell v. Farmers' Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Bell v. Henderson Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Alabama Farm Bureau Credit Corporation v. HelmsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sansom v. SturkieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Citizens Bank of Moulton v. BurksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Forlines v. PaulkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API