Legal Opinion

Bullard v. North Carolina National Bank

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1976No. 7618SC352PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiff contends the court erred in granting defendants’ motion for a jury trial made some two years and ten months after the time for requesting a jury trial under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 38(b) had expired. The trial court has discretion to grant a jury trial under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 39(b) even though jury trial has been waived pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 38 (b). Shankle v. Shankle, 289 N.C. 473, 223 S.E. 2d 380 (1976). Plaintiff has shown no abuse of discretion by the trial judge in granting defendants’ motion for a jury trial.

Plaintiff next contends the court erred by allowing into…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shankle v. ShankleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Reeves v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Rucker v. High Point Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Ingram v. McCuistonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. State v. ForehandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. GittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Wright ex rel. Frenck v. Blue Bird Cab Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API