Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2001No. 20010138PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Kyle Bell appeals the summary dismissal of his application for post-conviction relief and the denial of his request for court-appointed counsel for the post-conviction proceeding. We hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Bell’s request for court-appointed counsel, and the court did not err in summarily dismissing Bell’s application for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In August 1999, a jury found Bell guilty of the 1993 murder of eleven-year-old Jeanna North, and the trial court sentenced Bell to life imprisonment. In March 2000, we…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Hopfauf v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. BellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Woehlhoff v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Matter of Conservatorship of KinneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Whiteman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Patten v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. McClaryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. KukertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. St. Claire v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API