EUROCOM, SA v. Mahoney, Cohen & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
Defendant originally moved pursuant to Rule 14(a), F.R.Civ.P., for leave to add the-firm of Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton (“Cleary, Gottlieb”), attorneys for plaintiff, as third-party defendants. Plaintiff and Cleary, Gottlieb resisted that motion. As the arguments developed, defendant’s motion became transformed, at least in the alternative, into a motion that Cleary, Gottlieb be disqualified from representing plaintiff, pursuant to Code of Professional Responsibility, Appendix to the Judiciary Law, 29 McKinney’s Consol. Laws of New…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,328 J. P. Foley & Co., Inc. v. Oliver D. Vanderbilt, Arthur Young & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Hercules Chemical Co. v. North Star Reinsurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by13 opinions
- SMI Industries Canada Ltd. v. Caelter Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1984
- Jones v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Paretti v. Cavalier Label Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- State v. LeonardUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Keoseian v. Von KaulbachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.